Spot where execution will slow down before it hits the numbers.
You don’t have a performance problem …yet
You have a signal problem. Those are not the same thing
The first 90 days after a deal closes determine whether momentum builds or quietly erodes. Strategy is usually clear. What slows execution is human friction. Decision rights are fuzzy. Managers hesitate. Leaders avoid hard conversations while trying to “keep the peace.” Those small pauses multiply across locations and momentum slips. Talkola helps operators surface that friction early so integration keeps moving.
Operational Signal Intelligence
Operational Signal Intelligence identifies the human execution patterns that determine whether an organization can actually execute its plan.
Proudly trusted by:
About Dina
Dina Lynch Eisenberg, JD EMBA CO-OP
Dina is a certified organizational ombuds, the highest designation in the profession, and mediator with nearly thirty years of experience helping leaders resolve the conversations that slow execution.
Dina was recruited to serve as the inaugural organizational ombuds at Twitter and was part of the team that developed the conflict management system at Coca-Cola Enterprises. Her work has helped organizations stabilize leadership dynamics, strengthen decision clarity, and move critical initiatives forward
She brings perspective shaped by work across healthcare, manufacturing, financial services, and technology organizations through her Operational Signal Intelligence framework.
Execution Risk Advisor
What Slows Execution Post-Deal?
The Problem
Most integration plans assume momentum will build after the deal closes. What actually slows organizations down is human execution friction. One area of friction is uncertainty about who decides what.
Managers hesitate to escalate issues.
Leaders delay difficult conversations.
Decision authority becomes inconsistent across locations.
These small pauses compound quickly and slow the pace of execution. Operators often feel the drag long before it appears in financial reports.
Operational Signals
Most organizations measure financial performance, operational efficiency, and clinical outcomes. Those metrics are important, but they rarely reveal whether the organization can actually carry out its strategy.
The earliest signs usually appear in the way decisions move through the organization and how leaders handle tension, authority, and escalation.
Operational Signal Intelligence focuses on decision rights and four other early signals.
Decision Architecture Explained
Decision architecture determines who decides what, how decisions move, and when issues escalate.
As healthcare organizations expand across multiple locations, informal decision making begins to break down. Leaders assume someone else owns the decision. Momentum stalls.
Strong decision architecture restores clarity and protects execution speed.
Hidden or Overlooked Integration Risks
Most healthcare integrations do not stall because decision authority clarity is missing.
During diligence, leadership teams focus on financial performance, compliance, and systems. Those areas are visible and measurable. What often goes unexamined is how decisions actually move through the organization, cross-site alignment and escalation overload.
When decision authority clarity is weak, managers hesitate; and Leaders delay difficult conversations. Important decisions move sideways across locations instead of moving quickly to the person who can resolve them.
This is where execution risk quietly develops.
Without decision authority clarity, execution slows. Issues take longer to surface, accountability becomes uneven, and leadership signals vary from location to location.
Strengthening decision architecture helps organizations restore decision authority clarity early. When teams understand who decides what and when issues should escalate, integration momentum is easier to protect during the critical first ninety days after close.
Early warning signs include delayed decisions, unclear authority signals, and issues that move sideways across locations instead of escalating quickly.
What Clients Say…
Because Dina’s work falls under the umbrella of Ombuds work which is confidential, client identities are not disclosed. The reflections below come from leaders who have worked with Dina during periods of growth, integration, and organizational tension.
Start the Conversation
Every deal has a window where leadership conversations determine whether execution accelerates or quietly slows.
Some organizations want to surface risks before a transaction begins. Others are navigating the first ninety days after close. And sometimes a leadership team can feel that momentum has already started to stall.
If you are seeing hesitation around decisions, unclear authority signals, or issues that circulate across locations without resolution, it may be time to look more closely at the organization’s decision architecture.
A short conversation can often clarify where friction is building and what leaders can do to restore momentum.